And if he wins another one, it'll just cancel the first one out. Therefore, he'll have to win at least a third for it to have any meaning.
It's the fault of society for being so race-guilty. Why is it every commercial with a 'smart person' is black and the 'dumb one' is white? Why do the Brinks Security ads only feature white home invaders, when blacks commit 90% of the crime. Why is Al Sharpton influential when all he does is capitalize on black/white crime, but ignores the barbarism when that poor innocent black kid got stomped by other blacks.
I don't know how guilty they could possibly be when tv still manages to make practically nothing but stories starring upper-middle-class white folks with occassional ethnic sidekicks. The least commercials could do is make the black guy smart, but, you know, I really haven't seen enough of those sorts of commercials to think it a trend. Considering most commercials have white folks and barely stick in enough of "other" to begin with anyway, it'd be nice to make the few of them out there somewhat intelligent.
And while I don't doubt that Brinks is just doing stupid egg-shell walking so black customers won't get angry, they
could also not want black people in their commercials to begin with for varying reasons. (Although the funniest and most ironic excuse would be that the white actors who played the thieves were the most qualified actors for the part.) Oh, and Al Sharpton's just a douche.