Author Topic: Voyage Of The Dawn Treader (film) (Read 17908 times)

Derrick · « **Reply #60 on:** Aug 23, 2009, 10:27:51 PM »

Quote from: Rodent of Unusual Size on Aug 23, 2009, 10:18:07 PM

Quote from: Fiero on Aug 23, 2009, 09:20:40 PM
Well, since Hurin was a full on novel it's likely to have a better state.
Disagreed. I'd think Hurin would be nonsense to those who'd never read Silmarillion.

Hurin could be done right, especially since it's nothing more than a hero's tale.

Quote from: Rodent of Unusual Size on Aug 23, 2009, 10:18:07 PM

Coincidentally, the EE is what got me into the whole thing. I never saw the theatrical version of Fellowship...I saw my brother's copy of it right before Two Towers came out. After TTT pissed me off (due to having no start or end), I bought the combined books and read them over the course of a week, eventually reading most of the early stuff.

I only saw the movies because Kary wanted to see the second on a date. The next christmas, I bought the extended edition and showed all three to my brother. He loved it.

Fiero · « **Reply #61 on:** Aug 23, 2009, 10:50:35 PM »

Well I guess they guy I showed it to was just a fucking moron then. He was of the South Park opinion: These movies are about walking around a lot.

I did read the Silmarillion before reading Children of Hurin, however, I'm not sure if I remembered anything from the former when I read the latter, but I'm absolutely sure I had a good time.

Derrick · « **Reply #62 on:** Aug 24, 2009, 12:13:56 AM »

It's a mythology book, not an adventure book. I think anyone reading it thinking it'd be Lord of the Rings would be alerted to this by the first story.

Fiero · « **Reply #63 on:** Aug 24, 2009, 05:54:50 PM »

I remember that much.

Rodent of Unusual Size · « **Reply #64 on:** Aug 24, 2009, 10:00:46 PM »

It was certainly hard to follow in places, but it wasn't a problem after going through it the second time.

B E C K · « **Reply #65 on:** Aug 25, 2009, 06:40:37 PM »

Quote

A word of note, if you're going to get your friend who has never really even heard of LotR to watch the films, do no used the extended version. You will fail.

That must of been very painful for the both of you. Assuming he got through the whole thing and you were stuck there next to him.

Fiero · « **Reply #66 on:** Aug 26, 2009, 05:25:53 PM »

Quote from: B E C K on Aug 25, 2009, 06:40:37 PM

Quote
A word of note, if you're going to get your friend who has never really even heard of LotR to watch the films, do no used the extended version. You will fail.

That must of been very painful for the both of you. Assuming he got through the whole thing and you were stuck there next to him.

He gave up I think near the end of Two Towers. I showed him all the battle scenes though, he liked those.

B E C K · « **Reply #67 on:** Aug 27, 2009, 04:32:15 AM »

Oh wow, and here I thought you didn't get through Fellowship. He's a trooper. ROTK was the most boring one IMO.

Fiero · « **Reply #68 on:** Aug 27, 2009, 06:56:20 PM »

I'm getting frustrated with acronyms because I read that as ROTF. FUUUUUUUU

Rodent of Unusual Size · « **Reply #69 on:** Aug 27, 2009, 08:36:15 PM »

Two Towers was the one I had a hard time with, not for the movie itself, but the fact there was no start or end. ROTK was fine except for the crappy way it ended, and ended, and ended, and ended again.

Fiero · « **Reply #70 on:** Aug 27, 2009, 09:02:18 PM »

Quote from: Rodent of Unusual Size on Aug 27, 2009, 08:36:15 PM

Two Towers was the one I had a hard time with, not for the movie itself, but the fact there was no start or end. ROTK was fine except for the crappy way it ended, and ended, and ended, and ended again.

My friend who didn't like these movies somehow ending up watching the end (I guess its after a battle or something) and he said just that.

B E C K · « **Reply #71 on:** Aug 27, 2009, 10:49:18 PM »

Quote

ROTK was fine except for the crappy way it ended, and ended, and ended, and ended again.

Ha,ha, yeah. I still remember the groans from the audience when it turned out it wasn't ending after all.

What's ROTF? Return of the Fonz?

Rama · « **Reply #72 on:** Aug 28, 2009, 02:07:14 AM »

Revenge of the Fallen

B E C K · « **Reply #73 on:** Aug 28, 2009, 02:10:10 AM »

Gross. I like mine better. Heeeeeey.

Rama · « **Reply #74 on:** Aug 28, 2009, 02:14:35 AM »

Sit on it.

B E C K · « **Reply #75 on:** Aug 28, 2009, 02:50:28 AM »

You sit on it! And, like, spin.

The D · « **Reply #76 on:** Sep 01, 2009, 03:28:55 PM »

*watched the Church of the Fonz Family Guy episode last night*

And may the Fonz be with you.

And with you as well.

Let me get an Aaayyyyy...

Aaayyyy...

Fiero · « **Reply #77 on:** Sep 01, 2009, 06:03:20 PM »

Great episode.

B E C K · « **Reply #78 on:** Sep 02, 2009, 03:56:06 AM »

Ha ha, yeah. I saw about ten minutes of it myself.

Fiero · « **Reply #79 on:** Sep 02, 2009, 12:51:07 PM »

Go watch the rest of it.

B E C K · « **Reply #80 on:** Sep 06, 2009, 12:01:02 AM »

Too late. Besides, I'm kinda sick of Family Guy right now anyway. It was all I cared to stomach.

The D · « **Reply #81 on:** Sep 10, 2009, 02:55:35 PM »

In that episode Quagmire tells Peter of his latest sexual adventure as if to confess, and Peter tells him that his religion doesn't forbid sex. And then Quagmire says that he's telling EVERYONE about it.

And it got me thinking about starting my own church of a fictional character. the Church of Quagmire... for anyone who's a pervert, horny, likes bad sexual humor, or just really really appreciates hot chicks.

So of course IDE would be one of the head priests.

Fiero · « **Reply #82 on:** Sep 10, 2009, 05:01:01 PM »

This sounds like my kind of religion.