Author Topic: Amy Adams is Lois Lane? (Read 10257 times)

B E C K · « **on:** Mar 28, 2011, 01:16:56 AM »

I don't know what to think about this. At least she's a pretty good actress. Also, was Lois always a cougar? Rrrow.

blanktoe · « **Reply #1 on:** Mar 28, 2011, 02:11:38 AM »

If she brings that ass she had in stupid museum movie I'm there.

Rama · « **Reply #2 on:** Mar 28, 2011, 02:30:46 AM »

I can dig it.

Course I don't know if it's possible to make a good Superman movie again. Guess we shall see.

Fiero · « **Reply #3 on:** Mar 28, 2011, 03:31:54 PM »

Well, if it's anything like Zack Snyder's most recent film, it's going to be a big pile of garbage that doesn't tie together at all.

I'm hoping Suckerpunch was just a distraction for him.

I didn't realize he did Legend of the Guardians... Was it a hoot?

joe · « **Reply #4 on:** Mar 28, 2011, 04:58:56 PM »

Shit. Really? Guardians was a pretty good movie...

Better than Sucker Punch!

B E C K · « **Reply #5 on:** Mar 29, 2011, 12:22:37 AM »

Yeah, I'm hoping he's remains decent with ready-made material. The guy who directed Watchmen and 300 can't fuck up Superman. It is not allowed. Also, still haven't seen the owl movie.

Rodent of Unusual Size · « **Reply #6 on:** Mar 29, 2011, 09:34:35 PM »

Fiero · « **Reply #7 on:** Mar 30, 2011, 03:38:14 PM »

Quote from: Rodent of Unusual Size on Mar 29, 2011, 09:34:35 PM

joe · « **Reply #8 on:** Mar 30, 2011, 07:25:58 PM »

Quote from: Fiero on Mar 30, 2011, 03:38:14 PM

Quote from: Rodent of Unusual Size on Mar 29, 2011, 09:34:35 PM

B E C K · « **Reply #9 on:** Mar 31, 2011, 12:05:14 AM »

Quote from: joerammstein on Mar 30, 2011, 07:25:58 PM

Quote from: Fiero on Mar 30, 2011, 03:38:14 PM
Quote from: Rodent of Unusual Size on Mar 29, 2011, 09:34:35 PM

Well, probably not but I just wanted to belong.

Rodent of Unusual Size · « **Reply #10 on:** Mar 31, 2011, 11:25:20 PM »

I couldn't get the effect I was looking for with the "I'd Hit It!" text, as I did it in about five minutes on PS7, which lacks the tools to replicate the classic Superman script easily and quickly. But it works.

blanktoe · « **Reply #11 on:** Apr 13, 2011, 05:35:16 PM »

So this movie is gonna be a one off then when it's time for the Justice League movie they'll be a new guy playing Superman why cant they just make animated movies and call it a day

B E C K · « **Reply #12 on:** Apr 13, 2011, 11:26:18 PM »

Because they fail.

joe · « **Reply #13 on:** Apr 14, 2011, 01:46:24 AM »

Is that what they're saying? That it's a one-off?

If it actually makes bank, you damn well better believe they'll do a trilogy.

Because $$$.

B E C K · « **Reply #14 on:** Apr 15, 2011, 10:55:22 AM »

I thought these days they already planned sequels for stuff like this. Guess they're still butthurt about Supes Returns.

blanktoe · « **Reply #15 on:** Apr 15, 2011, 11:14:03 PM »

I just read the only reason their making this movie know is hold on to the movie rights. Which is probably the only reason Zack Snyder is still directing it.

IDE · « **Reply #16 on:** Apr 16, 2011, 07:13:09 PM »

Well if it's a payday for the guy who created supes family then I'm all for it no matter how bad the movie is.

If they're not getting anything from it then burn this motha down.

Faye Valentine · « **Reply #17 on:** Apr 17, 2011, 09:18:12 AM »

Amy Adams is the poor man's Kristen Dunst

Fiero · « **Reply #18 on:** Apr 17, 2011, 11:25:59 AM »

Quote from: Faye Valentine on Apr 17, 2011, 09:18:12 AM

Amy Adams is the poor man's Kristen Dunst

OH FUCK NO

This chick is miles ahead of that weird faced lady.

joe · « **Reply #19 on:** Apr 17, 2011, 04:37:28 PM »

Ha. That reminds me of an article I read about hot, famous white chicks that wouldn't be considered hot if they weren't famous.

Kirsten Dunst topped the list. Phucking Heiress-Whore was in there too.

Amy Adams, I find attractive. Same with Isla Fisher.

Someone needs to make a movie where Amy Adams and Isla Fisher are romantically involved.

I nominate Steven Spielberg.

blanktoe · « **Reply #20 on:** Apr 17, 2011, 05:47:03 PM »

more like Ang Lee.

edit-
I forgot Spielberg DID make a movie with lesbianism in it...The Color Purple.

joe · « **Reply #21 on:** Apr 17, 2011, 11:24:56 PM »

Wasn't Prince in that?

blanktoe · « **Reply #22 on:** Apr 17, 2011, 11:43:52 PM »

That'd be Purple Rain.

joe · « **Reply #23 on:** Apr 18, 2011, 01:45:48 AM »

Nah, that was that Tay Zonday guy.

Purple Rain! Some stay dry and others feel the pain.

B E C K · « **Reply #24 on:** Apr 18, 2011, 03:24:16 PM »

Quote from: blanktoe on Apr 15, 2011, 11:14:03 PM

I just read the only reason their making this movie know is hold on to the movie rights. Which is probably the only reason Zack Snyder is still directing it.

Yeah, they pretty much have a use-it-or-lose-it deal for Superman.

joe · « **Reply #25 on:** Apr 18, 2011, 03:31:44 PM »

I'm confused. I thought Warner Bros. owned Superman along with all the other DC superheroes.

It's like how TV networks produce shows for competing TV networks. House airs on Fox but is produced by NBC, for example.

What's up with that bizarre shit?

B E C K · « **Reply #26 on:** Apr 18, 2011, 03:46:08 PM »

I stand corrected. They have to make another film now because it'll cost them if they wait. Because they're gonna lose Superman anyway: http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118005806?refCatId=13

Quote

"This trial was only an interim step in the multifaceted accounting case which remains, in that it only concerned the secondary issue of whether DC Comics, or DC Comics and Warner Bros., would have to account to the Siegels," he said. "To put this in further perspective, the entire accounting action pales in comparison to the fact that in 2013, the Siegels, along with the estate of Joe Shuster, will own the entire original copyright to Superman, and neither DC Comics nor Warner Bros. will be able to exploit any new Superman works without a license from the Siegels and Shusters."

Toberoff also asseted that Larson found that Warner Bros. should have paid three to four times the amount actually paid for the Superman film rights and that he had found it "inequitable" that DC transferred the Superman film rights to Warner Bros. without the standard term providing for reversion for lack of ongoing exploitation.

"The Court pointedly ruled that if Warner Bros. does not start production on another Superman film by 2011, the Siegels will be able to sue to recover their damages," Toberoff added. "The Siegels look forward to the remainder of the case, which will determine how much defendants owe them for their exploitations of Superman."

blanktoe · « **Reply #27 on:** Apr 18, 2011, 04:19:41 PM »

I can't wait to see the bidding war between Disney and Warners for the comic rights.

Sam · « **Reply #28 on:** Apr 18, 2011, 04:30:50 PM »

Quote from: B E C K on Mar 31, 2011, 12:05:14 AM

Quote from: joerammstein on Mar 30, 2011, 07:25:58 PM
Quote from: Fiero on Mar 30, 2011, 03:38:14 PM
Quote from: Rodent of Unusual Size on Mar 29, 2011, 09:34:35 PM

Me too, but not if I have to wait for 5ths behind all of you.

joe · « **Reply #29 on:** Apr 18, 2011, 06:48:08 PM »

Could you imagine if there was some sort of huge fallout and Disney bought Superman and all of sudden he just shows up in all these Marvel comics with no explanation whatsoever?

It would never happen, but just imagine!

As for Sam, you know you'd wait. Also, the rest of us would be back in the queue for another go by then.