Okay, I lie. So I've chuckled at Dilbert a few times.
'Dilbert' Creator Scott Adams Compares Women Asking for Equal Pay to Children Demanding Candy
Read More:
http://www.comicsalliance.com/2011/03/25/scott-adam-sexist-mens-rights/#ixzz1Hrun5cqVThe thing I guess I find funny is not what he wrote but some of the reactions to it. HE'S THE GUY WHO WRITES DILBERT. It's fucking Dilbert. These days I'm not even reading it unless (1) I'm bored in my cube at work--hell, I even read Curtis--or (2) I'm taking a giant shit and have the newspaper in the bathroom with me. But people on some feminist site and on other places that have reposted it are all "OMG ill nvr rd DILBERT a gain". Dude, really? Who gives a shit what his opinion on
anything is?
I think my problem is that he went and deleted it, which made it look like he had something to hide, with some bs excuse about how it was taken out of context (so he removes it completely from the context, uh huh) and attracting outside readership (don't you want more hits on a website?). Then he posts this giant explanation in his blog about how everyone outside of the high-on-the-bell-curve readership of Dilbert is too emotional and lacks reading comprehension. The only thing worse than explaining a joke is too talk down to someone while explaining a joke. And he reposted the post's content anyway so what was the point of deleting it?
I'm annoyed Dilbert's made this fart so rich.