Author Topic: A Very Cactus Joe Birthday! (Read 5681 times)

B E C K · « **on:** Dec 25, 2010, 12:34:54 AM »

Now with extra prickles!

Hey, anyone still got that picture Gwynn drew of joe humping the cactus?

Fiero · « **Reply #1 on:** Dec 25, 2010, 12:58:59 AM »

http://www.google.com/images?q=joe+humping+the+cactus&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1440&bih=622

blanktoe · « **Reply #2 on:** Dec 25, 2010, 01:25:18 AM »

happy birthday son!

B E C K · « **Reply #3 on:** Dec 25, 2010, 02:12:18 AM »

Quote from: Fiero on Dec 25, 2010, 12:58:59 AM

http://www.google.com/images?q=joe+humping+the+cactus&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wi&biw=1440&bih=622

Sum o' dem results is weird.

Rama · « **Reply #4 on:** Dec 25, 2010, 09:00:53 AM »

Man, I bet that other birthday really overshadows yours...I mean Humphrey Bogart, wow.

Fiero · « **Reply #5 on:** Dec 25, 2010, 09:35:12 PM »

Any birthday on this date is going to be overshadowed by a much larger event. The first day that the ancients felt they could mark that the daytime was getting longer, but man, the solstice was a few days ago so who gives a shit about that? Hope you all had a great Saturnalia, too.

gwynn · « **Reply #6 on:** Dec 25, 2010, 10:57:30 PM »

Fiero · « **Reply #7 on:** Dec 26, 2010, 01:39:31 AM »

what is this i dont even

B E C K · « **Reply #8 on:** Dec 27, 2010, 12:11:28 AM »

Quote from: Fiero on Dec 26, 2010, 01:39:31 AM

what is this i dont even

It's pretty much the pic I was talking about.

Rama · « **Reply #9 on:** Dec 27, 2010, 01:07:57 AM »

I remember that. I bet there was some story behind it too, but I have mercifully wiped it from my mind.

Fiero · « **Reply #10 on:** Dec 27, 2010, 05:02:01 PM »

Why the axe?

Why the hat?

EDIT: Why the cactus?

gwynn · « **Reply #11 on:** Dec 27, 2010, 09:04:59 PM »

He's Canadian.

He used to have a hat like that.

Cactus are plentiful in Canadia.

Fiero · « **Reply #12 on:** Dec 27, 2010, 10:11:54 PM »

He is?

He did?

They are?

B E C K · « **Reply #13 on:** Dec 28, 2010, 01:08:54 AM »

I think 'no' on the last count. From what I remember, I started calling him Cactus Joe because I like to stick the word "Cactus" in front of names.

Rama · « **Reply #14 on:** Dec 28, 2010, 12:28:43 PM »

Why couldn't it have been Cotton Eye Joe? I mean where did he come from? Where did he go? Where did he come from Cotton Eye Joe?

Fiero · « **Reply #15 on:** Dec 28, 2010, 04:04:54 PM »

Quote from: Rama on Dec 28, 2010, 12:28:43 PM

Why couldn't it have been Cotton Eye Joe? I mean where did he come from? Where did he go? Where did he come from Cotton Eye Joe?

You are asking him in the third person. Weird.

B E C K · « **Reply #16 on:** Dec 29, 2010, 12:05:17 AM »

Quote from: Rama on Dec 28, 2010, 12:28:43 PM

Why couldn't it have been Cotton Eye Joe? I mean where did he come from? Where did he go? Where did he come from Cotton Eye Joe?

No, because that's totally gay.

Rama · « **Reply #17 on:** Dec 29, 2010, 12:15:51 AM »

Everything is gay to you.

gwynn · « **Reply #18 on:** Dec 29, 2010, 01:27:45 AM »

Everything IS gay.

Rama · « **Reply #19 on:** Dec 29, 2010, 01:26:57 PM »

Then there is no reason it can't be Cotton Eye Joe.

Fiero · « **Reply #20 on:** Dec 29, 2010, 08:26:05 PM »

Quote from: Rama on Dec 29, 2010, 01:26:57 PM

Then there is no reason it can't be Cotton Eye Joe.

He's right.

B E C K · « **Reply #21 on:** Jan 02, 2011, 12:40:27 AM »

No, he's wrong. "Cactus Joe" is just gay enough. But "Cotton Eye Joe" is, like, Super Saiyan gay. Unacceptable.

Rama · « **Reply #22 on:** Jan 02, 2011, 01:20:45 AM »

If it's Neil Patrick Harris gay...or Ru Paul Gay...it's still Gay. And if everything is, in fact, Gay...then the basis of the non-use of a name on that fact alone is illogical. Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury I submit that use of Cactus Joe over Cotton Eye Joe is in fact based solely on the preferences of this individual and not some level of gayness. I think we can agree that both are very, very Gay. That, however, is not in fact the issue here. And I know you will do the right thing. The defense rests.

Max Con · « **Reply #23 on:** Jan 02, 2011, 04:26:09 AM »

Fiero · « **Reply #24 on:** Jan 02, 2011, 04:34:49 PM »

That image makes me feel good about the human race.

B E C K · « **Reply #25 on:** Jan 04, 2011, 12:39:02 AM »

And it makes me feel good about cacti.

gwynn · « **Reply #26 on:** Jan 04, 2011, 08:31:02 AM »

Joe hasn't posted in this thread yet, has he?
Maybe I should do a newer cactus joe drawink, the old one feels a might stale.

Sam · « **Reply #27 on:** Jan 04, 2011, 08:42:52 AM »

Quote from: Fiero on Dec 27, 2010, 05:02:01 PM

Why the axe?

Why the hat?

EDIT: Why the cactus?

Because he's from Canada and therefore a lumberjack, of course.
And he's ok.

Fiero · « **Reply #28 on:** Jan 04, 2011, 04:43:55 PM »

He is?
He is?
He is?

Rama · « **Reply #29 on:** Jan 04, 2011, 05:14:31 PM »

Yes...He cuts down trees. He eats his lunch. He goes to the lavatory. On Wednesdays he goes shopping, and has buttered scones for tea.