A dude from Cinema Blend gave Turning Red a poorly-worded low review and the internet jumped on his ass. You
can take from his review that he's basically "ew, teenage Asian girl movie. no universal appeal" and he went in with this mindset from the offset. He never should've reviewed the movie, frankly. Again, I haven't seen this movie so I have no idea if I would enjoy it or think it's good or not. But unique story perspectives
do have 'universal appeal' as long as they still tell a human story at it's core: something with love and loss, embarrassment and pain and stakes of some sort. This guy actually wrote:
"By rooting Turning Red very specifically in the Asian community of Toronto, the film legitimately feels like it was made for Domee Shi’s friends and immediate family members. Which is fine… but also, a tad limiting in its scope."
Like, there's nothing wrong with rooting a film in a specific community. I'm not a fucking criminal and I enjoyed both Infernal Affairs and The Departed. Not being a Chinese man in Hong Kong or a white American-Irish man in Boston has no bearing on my enjoyment. Complaining about a specific community being featured is bs.
He also does some icky things like calling a movie about a child "the horniest movie in Pixar history."
I have the feeling he might've had some legitimate criticism (like the manic feeling in the movie, which I notice the majority of modern movies gravitate to) but his wording in the review was loaded. The reviewer and Cinema Blend apologized and Cinema Blend replaced the review completely. Frankly, I would've liked it if they just had the guy rewrite the review. It would've been more of a learning experience for him to examine his biases. Instead, it's always quicker to rugsweep.
Linking this Medium article talking about the review because the review was removed:
https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/disneys-turning-red-review-pixar-transforms-period-perils-into-a-warm-fuzzy-and-empowering-coming-of-age-tale