So I'm in this heavy debate thread about sex crimes started by a girl who was raped at a young age. Fast forward to the end of the thread 10 or so pages later.
This guy admits that he's attracted to children. He admits to being a pedophile. He sees nothing wrong with this. He says there's a big difference between pedos, who find children attractive but don't do anything to them, and child molesters, who actually do things with children. He sees himself as being someone who's attracted to children but won't do anything with one.
He claims to have evidence there's a huge difference between a child molester and a pedo. He debates that children cannot consent to sex and expects me and other people in the thread to show evidence of that. He sees nothing wrong with a man being attracted to a pre-pubesent child and demands evidence that it's wrong. I said that having sex with children is unnatural, and then he goes and "proves" that it IS natural by comparing humans to apes like bonobos who have pedophilic relationships. Problem is, WE ARE NOT WILD ANIMALS. And when I say that "Children cannot consent to sex, they do not understand it, and they are not acceptable partners", he expects me to prove it as well.
In fact, he expects me to prove, with cold hard scientific facts, that there's something wrong with being attracted to children and even having relationships with them....
And then he says we're all spreading hate and biggotry as if he's gay and we're being gay haters. "I was born attracted to children like gay people were born gay! I can't change it!"
The thread has been dead for a month or so after he demanded evidence that pedophilia and child sex is a bad thing. I've been too busy to look anything up myself.
