Author Topic: More reasons to hate the Goberment (Read 5836 times)

The D · « **on:** May 10, 2005, 10:42:24 PM »

If Tom sucking Lucas' chowdercannon isn't bad enough, this crap's enough to make me join the rebellion.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/gay_sperm_donors

Quote

NEW YORK - To the dismay of gay-rights activists, the Food and Drug Administration is about to implement new rules recommending that any man who has engaged in homosexual sex in the previous five years be barred from serving as an anonymous sperm donor.

The FDA has rejected calls to scrap the provision, insisting that gay men collectively pose a higher-than-average risk of carrying the AIDS virus. Critics accuse the FDA of stigmatizing all gay men rather than adopting a screening process that focuses on high-risk sexual behavior by any would-be donor, gay or straight.

"Under these rules, a heterosexual man who had unprotected sex with HIV-positive prostitutes would be OK as a donor one year later, but a gay man in a monogamous, safe-sex relationship is not OK unless he's been celibate for five years," said Leland Traiman, director of a clinic in Alameda, Calif., that seeks gay sperm donors.

Ah yes, so anyone who's gay automaticaly has AIDS now, is that right?

B E C K · « **Reply #1 on:** May 10, 2005, 10:48:04 PM »

GAH. =(

blanktoe · « **Reply #2 on:** May 10, 2005, 10:49:20 PM »

Wickedly Yours E · « **Reply #3 on:** May 10, 2005, 10:50:58 PM »

OHHH shut up and move to Canada. America supposedly sucks anyway.

blanktoe · « **Reply #4 on:** May 10, 2005, 10:53:11 PM »

Too many French people live there. Maybe if French women had big asses.

Wickedly Yours E · « **Reply #5 on:** May 10, 2005, 10:54:40 PM »

Don't get me started on the French.

The D · « **Reply #6 on:** May 10, 2005, 11:02:11 PM »

http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/n...cs/11614002.htm

Quote

WASHINGTON - (KRT) - Senators from both parties, state officials and opponents criticized legislation the Senate approved Tuesday mandating tough federal standards for driver's licenses - a measure meant to improve homeland security but which they said would have sweeping unintended consequences: huge costs to the states and headaches for the nation's drivers.

All 100 senators voted to approve the licensing measure, which its backers attached to a must-pass, emergency $82 billion spending bill to fund the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan and Asian tsunami relief efforts. But many immediately raised questions about the license provisions.

Licenses issued by any state unable or unwilling to meet the new federal standards would not be recognized by the federal government. They couldn't be used as ID to board commercial flights, for example.

Under the law, to get a new or renewed license would require a document showing a person's name and date of birth, such as a birth certificate; a document verifying a person's legal presence in the United States; a photo ID; proof of a valid Social Security number and evidence that the applicant actually resides at a certain address, a utility bill for instance.

That would mean more identification will be required for a driver's license than is needed for a U.S. passport that currently requires a photo ID like a drivers license and proof of citizenship, typically a birth certificate.

Sorry Faye, you'll probably be booted out of this country if you can't get "proof of identification".

I don't get this. How can congress slap a law for a national ID on the back of a bill that has nothing to do with it, but has to do with spending more fucking money on Iraq. And what's with that "Must Pass" bill? Why must a bill pass?

Yay, national ID! Yay, BB! BB! BB! GB! GB! GB!

GB = BB?

When the government walks over state rights and republican fucks slap bills on top of other bills to get them to pass, the government is not the government I want in powet. I blame the republican-majority congress, I blame Bush, I blame conservative christians.

Did anyone hear about the guy in Georgia (the country) who threw the gernade at Bush and missed? Asshole, he should have hit him! Then one evil Sith Lord would have been destroyed.

*lights a flag on fire and hoists up an Alliance flag*

PapaMidnight · « **Reply #7 on:** May 10, 2005, 11:17:29 PM »

I'm an amendment to be, yes an amendment to be
And I'm hoping that they'll ratify me.
You see there are a lot of flag-burners
That have got too much freedom
And I wanna make it legal for policeman to beat 'em
Cause there's limits to our liberties.
At least I hope and pray that there are
Because these liberal freaks go too far.

Quote

When the government walks over state rights and republican fucks slap bills on top of other bills to get them to pass, the government is not the government I want in powet. I blame the republican-majority congress, I blame Bush, I blame conservative christians.

While your at it you shouldn't forget to blame the Democrats and Liberals because they do it just as much. It's just that when they do it, it usually isn't the kinda crap that pisses everybody off like this shite. I'm a Left-winger myself but truth be told the whole freakin system is screwed up not just one side or the other.

Faye Valentine · « **Reply #8 on:** May 10, 2005, 11:23:52 PM »

Quote

Sorry Faye, you'll probably be booted out of this country if you can't get "proof of identification".

bitch, i have AAALLL of that, including a ssn. plus they would NEVER kick me out of this country. they love us international students and our infinite bank accounts :-/

Derrick · « **Reply #9 on:** May 11, 2005, 07:24:49 AM »

Quote

If Tom sucking Lucas' chowdercannon isn't bad enough, this crap's enough to make me join the rebellion.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/gay_sperm_donors

Quote
NEW YORK - To the dismay of gay-rights activists, the Food and Drug Administration is about to implement new rules recommending that any man who has engaged in homosexual sex in the previous five years be barred from serving as an anonymous sperm donor.

The FDA has rejected calls to scrap the provision, insisting that gay men collectively pose a higher-than-average risk of carrying the AIDS virus. Critics accuse the FDA of stigmatizing all gay men rather than adopting a screening process that focuses on high-risk sexual behavior by any would-be donor, gay or straight.

"Under these rules, a heterosexual man who had unprotected sex with HIV-positive prostitutes would be OK as a donor one year later, but a gay man in a monogamous, safe-sex relationship is not OK unless he's been celibate for five years," said Leland Traiman, director of a clinic in Alameda, Calif., that seeks gay sperm donors.

Ah yes, so anyone who's gay automaticaly has AIDS now, is that right?

Why should we care if the Government is saying you can't sell your baby batter?

Merla · « **Reply #10 on:** May 11, 2005, 08:39:35 AM »

Ouch!!!

Wickedly Yours E · « **Reply #11 on:** May 11, 2005, 08:47:57 AM »

I dunno, there's something appealing about getting paid to whack off into a cup.

Faye Valentine · « **Reply #12 on:** May 11, 2005, 10:07:43 AM »

just for 25 bucks??
if you are a girl and donate eggs, they pay you at least 8 thousand per egg

edit: i wouldnt do it anyway

Derrick · « **Reply #13 on:** May 11, 2005, 05:45:05 PM »

Quote

I dunno, there's something appealing about getting paid to whack off into a cup.

Eh, it buys lunch.

blanktoe · « **Reply #14 on:** May 11, 2005, 10:05:40 PM »

Why dont women sell their wombs?

Faye Valentine · « **Reply #15 on:** May 11, 2005, 10:10:03 PM »

ewww

Fiero · « **Reply #16 on:** May 11, 2005, 10:43:18 PM »

Quote

Quote
I dunno, there's something appealing about getting paid to whack off into a cup.
Eh, it buys lunch.

Or a blowjob. Just like the SBJ guy with his camera-in-glasses.

Derrick · « **Reply #17 on:** May 12, 2005, 12:43:31 AM »

Quote

Quote

Quote
I dunno, there's something appealing about getting paid to whack off into a cup.
Eh, it buys lunch.
Or a blowjob. Just like the SBJ guy with his camera-in-glasses.

But since we all don't like sucking down cock (maybe some here do...) I'll just jizz in a cup.