20
« on: Jun 25, 2012, 01:10:41 PM »
I really don't agree at all with his base postulation, that Legend of Korra is fundementally about how cool it is having cool powers and having cool fights. Boiling it down to that ignores the various obvious parallels that can be drawn between the situation in Republic City and the powder keg that was places like 18th century France and 19th century Russia. The only way that could have been more overt is just calling Amon Robespierre or having one of the council members saying the non-benders can eat cake. May as well just have the bending removal take place with a guillotine-like device. If the first series was about the dangers of unrestrained nationalism, this one just as effectively portrays how fucked up it is if we try to force the whole world to be equal.
What about the themes of racial cleansing? I mean, the air nomad genocide prior to Last Airbender while evil, wasn't even about trying to wipe out their culture. It was a means to an end of combatting the Avatar. But in Legend of Korra, it's all about wiping them out as a people. Amon hates them and everything they stand for. You can hear the glee in his voice when he has Tenzin and his family up on the stage and he's about to wipe out the airbenders once and for all. With Sozin, it was buisiness. With Amon it was pleasure, which I found much more frightening.
More than anything, Legend of Korra was a story about accepting responsibilities and learning to serve people that may not even like you. People hated Aang, but it was either because of what he did, abandoming everyone for 100 years, or because he was seen as an enemy of their nation. But Korra? People hated Korra simply because of who she was, because she was born with the equivelent of a genetic abnormality.
Any failings of Legend of Korra lay with the individual characterizations, not with the base themes or lack thereof.