The Sphere

General Garbage => Tropical Paradise of Hard Shelled Fruits => Topic started by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 26, 2006, 01:21:09 PM

Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 26, 2006, 01:21:09 PM
This movie suffered due to the director, because the film overall lacked direction.

Now I am not saying this was a bad movie, the actors were wonderful, if lacking there was too many. Magneto was amazing throughout the film, though Halle Berry did 'over act' a bit much throughout. Another problem was the shortness that Cyclops and Professor X had onscreen. I know why Cyclops was cut short, but Professor X was killed off in a second. What is interesting is they never showed Cyclops being killed.

Pluses? Naked Human Mystique with nice dark hair ^_^ Magneto living, and proving that even with 4 cure needles stuck in him, the cure is only temporary. Iceman all iced up, finally, and the way it was done was well presented. Cyclops actually was presented well.

Minuses? Bad direction, it was all over the place x.x Little to no screen time for Rogue, Cyclops, and Professor X, they were totally ignored. Wolverine was an emo pussy craving Jean throughout the entire film, even though she said she picked Cyclops. Even though SHE SAID she picked Scott over him, he still whined and pined. I was so glad he killed her, but again that was probably a directors issue. Also there was alot of sex...

Best scene? The last one, showing a depowered Magneto, sitting all alone in the park playing chess with an open chair. The pieces are metal, and even though he took 4 shots of the depowering cure, yet he reaches out, and with his powers, slightly nudges it. :)

Bonus scene(s):

I didn't stick around because I heard it was a rumour, but apparently there are several bonus scenes. The only one I've seen stated by alot of people is Professor X living on in another mutant's body, a mutant that had no soul or somesuch. I've heard rumors about there being actually 4 scenes, depending on where you live depends on which one you will see at the end. I hope the Cyclops one is true, especially since the only thing the showed before he 'died' was a rouge sucking effect, which was not quite how she killed everyone else.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: TM2 Rampage on May 27, 2006, 04:38:14 AM
I stayed until after the credits. For me, at least, it was Professor X living on in that one vegetable-like guy's body. He was mentioned early on in the movie, and the Prof. was asking the class about the ethicalness of putting someone's mind into such a person as that.


The movie was a bit slow. I actually felt bored at times. I have more respect for Bryan Singer (the original director) now.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 27, 2006, 12:22:33 PM
As do I.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on May 28, 2006, 03:46:37 PM
I thought about seeing this on Monday, but maybe not.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: TM2 Rampage on May 28, 2006, 11:09:50 PM
This year seems kinda bleak for superhero movies.


I hope Superman Returns is good, but so far the trailers haven't thrilled me much.

And Ghost Rider... looks... eh.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 28, 2006, 11:36:55 PM
I don't see Nick Cage doing anything interesting.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Extra Zero on May 29, 2006, 02:32:32 PM
Superman looks weak as shit, but then again, so were the Christopher Reeves movies.  

Don't even fucking bring up Richard Pryor being in the third one.  I love Richard Pryor, he was one of the funniest people to ever exist, but not even he could have made that movie enjoyable.

I was so hoping that they would have re-launched the franchise, like they did with Batman...but no...  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 29, 2006, 02:34:29 PM
Batman > Superman.

You can't do much with Superman.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Extra Zero on May 29, 2006, 03:54:33 PM
Paul Dini and Bruce Timm did a lot with Superman.  Yeah, it was animated, but they were able to make a lot of interesting stories...
 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on May 29, 2006, 07:53:37 PM
I skipped X-Men and saw The DaVinci Code instead.  I wish (SPOILERISH)



































They hadn't fucked with the ending like they did.  I would've given it four stars otherwise.  Everything else was more or less acceptable for me except that.  And then Merla brought up a good point: the ritual the Priory did that involved sex, they never explained that.  So Sauniere just looks like a big pervert.  :lol:
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Extra Zero on May 29, 2006, 09:52:11 PM
*Pimp-slaps Nuri*

"I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!"
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on May 29, 2006, 11:34:16 PM
The whole Juernaut character was annoyin.  Why didn't he and Chuck reckonise each other? Why did Leech's powers work on him? Is he a Mutant in this? Do Leech's powers also work on non mutants? They didn't drain the powet from his X-Box or whatever the hell that was. I thouht for a minute the reason he was sent after the kid was because he wasn't a mutant.

Anyway... I also shit myself when I saw Maneto move that piece. I thouht we would see  Chuck maniest himself somehow in that scene but just didn't expect that.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 12:10:01 AM
Quote
The whole Juernaut character was annoyin.  Why didn't he and Chuck reckonise each other? Why did Leech's powers work on him? Is he a Mutant in this? Do Leech's powers also work on non mutants? They didn't drain the powet from his X-Box or whatever the hell that was. I thouht for a minute the reason he was sent after the kid was because he wasn't a mutant.

Anyway... I also shit myself when I saw Maneto move that piece. I thouht we would see  Chuck maniest himself somehow in that scene but just didn't expect that.
Juggie was a mutant, and who's to say they didn't recognize each other. They have done that before, not saying a word before.

I loved the ending, because I am a Magneto fanboy. Ian McKellan makes the perfect Magneto.

"YOU SHOULD HAVE KILLED ME WHEN YOU HAD THE CHANCE!!!"
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on May 30, 2006, 12:32:41 AM
I've been thinking of giving X3 a shot tomorrow, but only cause I have a left over movie gift card from X-mas.

And I'm not going to see the Da Vinci Code. I've read the book and I don't know what all the fuss is about, it was a mediocre book and an amazingly fast read. I'm sure the movie will be just as mediocre.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 01:33:44 AM
I argued with a woman in the photolab over it. I tried telling her that if was capable of proving the bible wrong, maybe the bible was wrong if a fictional thriller could do that. She left angry, fucking tourists.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on May 30, 2006, 01:51:54 AM
The Bible doesn't comment on it one way or the other. It only says that she was his most beloved disciple. You can take that how you want, but it never says he was married and it never said he wasn't.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on May 30, 2006, 06:20:41 AM
Quote
Juggie was a mutant,
Do you mean in the comic he was a mutant or in the movie?  'cause it was my understandin that he was just a normal human made super because of the bands of... well I'm not about to try to spell that but somethin like "ciserack".
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: TM2 Rampage on May 30, 2006, 07:12:30 AM
Juggernaut is a mutant in the movie, I guess. I guess they though it'd be too weird and confusing to introducing a non-mutant superbeing into a movie where the only superbeings are mutants.

I think they even called him a mutant, which was why they were transporting him in that truck with the other mutants and the guards had those cure things in their guns.


Also

more like

"TOO MUCH IRON IN YOUR BLOOD."
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Extra Zero on May 30, 2006, 08:08:26 AM
Yeah, Juggernaut is definately a mutant in the movie, with no mention of him being Xavier's half-brother.  They announce his powers as being "unstoppable when he builds up momentum".

I'm surprised that this offended people more than movie Psylocke's powet of invisibility, or her death.  Flea was apparently in there too, and killed by Jean aswell.  

I'm just pissed off that they make no mention of Nightcrawler, at all.  They just expect you to buy the shitty game to find out what happened...
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Faye Valentine on May 30, 2006, 08:55:09 AM
Quote
The Bible doesn't comment on it one way or the other. It only says that she was his most beloved disciple. You can take that how you want, but it never says he was married and it never said he wasn't.
Don't start talking about that!! Everybody is talking about that, its turning to be sooooOOOoOo boring
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rodent of Unusual Size on May 30, 2006, 11:29:07 AM
Besides, it's incorrect, anyway.  The beloved disciple was John, not Mary Magdelene.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 01:07:14 PM
Quote
Yeah, Juggernaut is definately a mutant in the movie, with no mention of him being Xavier's half-brother.  They announce his powers as being "unstoppable when he builds up momentum".

I'm surprised that this offended people more than movie Psylocke's powet of invisibility, or her death.  Flea was apparently in there too, and killed by Jean aswell.  

I'm just pissed off that they make no mention of Nightcrawler, at all.  They just expect you to buy the shitty game to find out what happened...
The press releases said he was indeed X's step brother, but again just because they shared one scene didn't mean they had to go all emo and shit milking each other while prattling on about child abuse.

And Psylocke is screwed yet again by marvel.

And Nightcrawler is central in the game since Fox refused to have him in the movie. Gay Fox. >.<
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Max Con on May 30, 2006, 02:37:19 PM
Don't you mean gay Alan Cumming?



ohhhhhhhhhhhhh
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 03:04:17 PM
Magneto and Bryan Singer are gay.

Halle Berry and Rebecca Romijn are only gay in my dreams... >.>;
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on May 30, 2006, 06:28:23 PM
Nihtcrawler in movie 2 sucked my shit.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Dagurasu on May 30, 2006, 07:08:26 PM
I thought the movie was too short. I was bothered by the fact that with the title "last stand", and the previews, I expected the whole world to go half to shit, with mutants on both sides and the army all fighting to mutual extinction. It was cool the way they fit the Sentinel in there though, even though you never get to see the whole damn thing, just the head. I was also annoyed at the lack of X-men, I expected more people in the movie than just the 6 or so at the end.

Also, Kitty's actress is short for a 19 year old.  :P

Quote
"I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!"
I almost orgasmed when he said that. The movie wouldn't be complete without that line.

Quote
because I am a Magneto fanboy
Are you gay for Magneto?

Quote
I'm just pissed off that they make no mention of Nightcrawler, at all. They just expect you to buy the shitty game to find out what happened...
What happened? I was pissed he wasn't in the movie.

Quote
Besides, it's incorrect, anyway. The beloved disciple was John, not Mary Magdelene.
Jesus was gay for John? Certainly would throw the church into chaos if that was true.   :lol:

Quote
Nihtcrawler in movie 2 sucked my shit.
Better than the cartoon. In the cartoon he sounded fucking Indian.

and which one was Psylocke?
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 07:15:27 PM
You saying I am Brendan Fraiser?!
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on May 30, 2006, 08:01:35 PM
19?  Shit... that's one flat assed 19 year old.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Faye Valentine on May 30, 2006, 08:10:50 PM
Yeah, she was in that other movie that is supposedly coming out soon, where she gets raped by some old guy.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 08:21:47 PM
No no, he thinks he is gonna rape her, only for her to reveal herself as a sick GoGo Yubari type girl who loves torturing people attracted to her.

I think she pulled off being a 16 year old, though she looks nothing like the previous actresses.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Faye Valentine on May 30, 2006, 08:24:29 PM
Are you being serious or are you just bs-ing?
 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 08:26:37 PM
I am serious if it's the movie I'm talking about, the girl is a 14 year old picked up by a net pedophile, who takes her home, and she asks for a drink, and she slipps him a mickey. When he wakes up, she does some sick shit to him, and basically enslaves him.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on May 30, 2006, 08:35:59 PM
Ah. Saw a trailer for that. I would have put her at about 13 in that one.  Fucked up.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on May 30, 2006, 11:47:48 PM
Quote
and which one was Psylocke?


She was the Asian Chick with the purple Hair that hung around Callisto.

Well I saw it today and I can't believe they used Spike. Ugh! It was ok...but Wolverine did come across as a bit whiney about the whole Jean thing. I mean Cyc could have got away with those speeches, but it's just not Wolverine. And speaking of Cyc, I don't think he is dead. It may just be the fact that I love Cyclops or the fact that James Marsden's acted better in his 3 scenes then Halle Berry did in the whole movie, but I just don't think he died. First off something really strange was going on when he kissed Jean, you don't see him die, (There is the old movie rule, if you don't see them die they aren’t dead) and third Jean was passed out when they found her which mean something happened between her kissing Cyc, and when Storm and Wolverine found her. Also there is the fact that she didn't kill any good guys unless they attacked her.... Showing that the Jean part of her was dominate unless provoked. I wouldn't be surprised if Jean knew the Phoenix had been set free and basically put Cyc someplace safe so she wouldn't have to fight and maybe kill him. At least that makes sense from my standpoint, but it may be wishful thinking.I'm also glad Rouge seems to be out of the way now. While really important to the plot of X-Men she really seemed like dead weight in 2 and 3.


 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 30, 2006, 11:56:46 PM
I agree completely about Cyc. They coulda showed him die, since they showed everyone else.

And I don't think that was 'psylocke' psylocke, but it coulda been just some random mutant chick with purple hair.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on May 31, 2006, 12:13:12 AM
I would be inclined to aree but:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0376994/ (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0376994/)

Quote
Mei Melançon  ....  Psylocke (as Mei Melançon)
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on May 31, 2006, 12:42:27 AM
Quote
I'm surprised that this offended people more than movie Psylocke's powet of invisibility, or her death.
That does it, I'm not seeing that movie ....unless I somehow get to see it for free after it leaves theaters.  But yeah!


The movie is "Hard Candy" I believe.  I think the plot was that the girl's friend was molested or raped or something like that, so she lured out the guy who did it to extract a little vilgilante justice.  But I think it's also possible that the guy didn't even do anything to her friend.  I haven't seen it mind you, so I'm not certain.


::looks at aDam's signature::  g-spot?
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on May 31, 2006, 05:28:31 AM
An unintentional but obvious joke I've made time and time aain in the past few days since losin that key... somewhere.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie AKA on May 31, 2006, 12:12:04 PM
I can forgive just about anything wrong with this installment due to the flawless spot-on interpretation of Hank McCoy.   And I'm talking about X-Men/X-Factor Beast - I have no idea who that clod impersonating him in the Avengers was.  <_<  I cringed when I heard Kelsey Grammer was going to play him and I'm delighted to admit I was wrong.  

Quick!  Which two comic mutants was movie Calisto a combination of?   :P  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on May 31, 2006, 01:08:57 PM
Qucksilver and.......





Shit....I should know this.

And yeah, Beast was pretty spot on. I was actually happy about Grammer being beast, but then I was always a big Cheers/Frasier fan.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on May 31, 2006, 01:14:14 PM
Rama for one!

Hint:  the other one is a girl, and the powet in question was not her main one, but it's what she was used for.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on May 31, 2006, 01:15:13 PM
I wanna say Scarlet Witch, but that seems to easy with Quicksilver being the other one.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on May 31, 2006, 02:24:36 PM
Scarlet Witch or Longshot or Domino.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on May 31, 2006, 02:29:31 PM
Not yet!  And Longshot is not a girl!

Next hint: red hair
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Max Con on May 31, 2006, 03:23:48 PM
Ehhhh ... I could probably say Caliban and be half right.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on May 31, 2006, 03:49:24 PM
My first guess until Mags asked her to track Mystique.  Caliban could detect & track, but I can't remember or find mention of his locating a specific one he had never met.

It's pretty esoteric and from the highly-confusing Days of Future Past AU - Rachel Summers AKA Future Phoenix, who was used as a mutant hound and could zero in on particular ones due to her psionic levels.

Of course, it could be both.  No matter how you slice it, we still have "disposable custom mutie for plot device" and comic Callisto was present in name only.  I can't get all AR about the comic/movie clashes and stay sane, but Storm was a much better fighter than portrayed against Callisto.  I seem to remember a little issue of Morlock leadership, which I thought might be a backstory when they implied a beef existed between them in the movie pre-buzz.   Then again, instead of our lovely goddess, we have Homegirl Ororo.  I was waiting for her to put her hands on her hips, snap her fingers at Logan and say "nigga please" more than once.

As long as they stay consistent within the movie storyline, I'll be content.  I'm just glad they didn't make Hank a teenager like they did Bobby & Cyc.  <_<
 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on May 31, 2006, 03:54:52 PM
Well in the Screen Writers defense....Callistos powers in the comic where pretty lame.
 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on May 31, 2006, 04:21:07 PM
No argument there.  Everybody has enhanced senses & reflexes.  It's the economy mutation.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on May 31, 2006, 05:06:31 PM
And what good is enhanced sight if you have no depth perception?  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 01, 2006, 04:16:38 AM
:lol:!!!!!!
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Faye Valentine on Jun 01, 2006, 08:07:19 AM
Why the fuck are you people discussing mutant's powers? LOSERRSSS
You should be discussing who's the hottest one there!( and of course it's Cyclops. Although the ice man looks like this guy I used to hook up with only cause he looked like friggin' Orlando Bloom)
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie AKA on Jun 01, 2006, 08:11:22 AM
Quote
Why the fuck are you people discussing mutant's powers? LOSERRSSS

Um....because we've read the comics & don't watch movies because we want to sleep with the actors?  :mellow:

Quote
And what good is enhanced sight if you have no depth perception?

That fits your avatar rather well, Rama.  :lol:


 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Faye Valentine on Jun 01, 2006, 08:53:03 AM
Quote

Um....because we've read the comics & don't watch movies because we want to sleep with the actors?  :mellow:
 
That's more like it B)  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rodent of Unusual Size on Jun 01, 2006, 01:44:15 PM
Probably because I don't wear my cock outside my clothes and let it think for me.  Not everything is a matter of screwing or getting screwed by something, sad as the case may be.  Although I'd like to hit Rebecca Romaijin (sp?WTF) so hard her ass would be welded to the wall.

Then again, I never read the X-books, so the movies are about my only experience with the franchise.  Which is why I don't care how much they butcher it.  

Now, when Superman comes out, I'll go the night it debuts (June 30th, BTW...they moved it up), since I've been a Superman fan since I was 3.  Then you can watch some anal comic bitching on my part.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on Jun 01, 2006, 02:17:14 PM
Quote
Although I'd like to hit Rebecca Romaijin (sp?WTF) so hard her ass would be welded to the wall.

Hugh Jackman's pretty easy on my eyes.  I'll even run the risk of furrie accusations and say Hank was pretty darned cute because I'm so relieved that they didn't use the mofo sumbitch Cat Dude incarnation. That still pisses me off - like we don't have enough cat people in comics.   <_<  It's the best Kelsey Grammer has ever looked. :lol:

Quote
Now, when Superman comes out, I'll go the night it debuts (June 30th, BTW...they moved it up), since I've been a Superman fan since I was 3. Then you can

I take it that you already know Lois is a single mom with an annoyingly precocious kid then?  And chell your schedule - this morning I heard they moved it up again to June 28.


 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on Jun 01, 2006, 02:50:49 PM
Finishing the thought after a convoluted phone call - no insult to Halle or Rebecca fans, but I found it a pretty libido-free movie because I don't care for any of the women.  I wish Iman (http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0c/07/434ac8d9-0002a-03a7b-400cb8e1) could have been Storm.  :mellow:  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Evil Monkey-Tom on Jun 01, 2006, 03:08:19 PM
I am kinda disapointed overall with how Cyclops has been portrayed in the movies. He never led anything other than the Statue of Liberty, and the rest of the movies he was there more as Wolverine's foil for Jean's love than anything. I can only imagine what the Wolverine movie is going to be like, since we basically had three already.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on Jun 01, 2006, 03:14:41 PM
Yeah me either....I'm still hoping for an X4 and the return of Cyc where he'll really gets to shine. But I heard that the reason they killed Cyc off was because he went with Synger to Superman: Returns. That puts some doubts on my theroy about him coming back.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on Jun 01, 2006, 03:14:43 PM
The 4-part Wolverine series was interesting, but then he'll be all weepey over Mariko.  Do his past with Sabretooth & he's morose over Silver Fox.  Do his wild man in the Canadian woods storyline, and he's got a mope-on for Heather.  Guy's just a damn mess when it comes to women.  :lol:

 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on Jun 01, 2006, 03:16:32 PM
That'd be hard to push into one movie though....but of course you could do ala Highlander with flashbacks and I'd love to see Sabertooth and Wolverine go at it again.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: tomduo on Jun 01, 2006, 07:45:28 PM
They could do Origin: the movie. That would actually be good.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Max Con on Jun 01, 2006, 08:17:02 PM
Except Origin, while insightful, was really boring.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: tomduo on Jun 01, 2006, 09:17:22 PM
I enjoyed it, you ninny.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on Jun 01, 2006, 10:35:32 PM
The big problem is that it's hard for Logan to go hoping down memory lane, cause he still doesn't remember his past in the movies. He turned Stryker down when he offered at the end of X2, and they didn't even address it in X3. I guess you could say that as a last dying gift to Logan, Jean unlocked those memories for him, or you could have something happen in the first act so he could remember.  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie AKA on Jun 02, 2006, 08:26:48 AM
Well, according to the latest from Avi Arad,  the Wolvering movie will be "about his life, his mysteries, and his loves. It's not really a prequel or a sequel". And Magneto will be in it.   From what I heard on the way to work, Hugh Jackman will be heavily involved in the script & production. That eases my mind as he really loves the character, and not just because it was his big international break.   I've also read that "it is assumed that the Wolverine movie will flesh out Logan's secret history and his participation in Canada's super soldier experiments. In the desperate search for his lost memory, he will travel from the wilds of the Canadian wilderness to the teeming cities of Japan and beyond."

So Rama just might get to see Alpha Flight after all.... :P  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: tomduo on Jun 02, 2006, 10:43:31 AM
I doubt it. I wonder if they will get Sam Jackson to play Nick Fury?
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on Jun 02, 2006, 01:36:57 PM
Quote
o Rama just might get to see Alpha Flight after all....  :P



Yay.....I can't wait.  <_<


Quote
I wonder if they will get Sam Jackson to play Nick Fury?

You would deny Hasselhoff the honor of reprising the role?  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: tomduo on Jun 02, 2006, 10:50:21 PM
Yes.

Tommy Lee Jones or Mickey Rourke could probably do it, too.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Wickedly Yours E on Jun 03, 2006, 12:07:50 AM
Mickey Rourke. Oh Yeah.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Rama on Jun 03, 2006, 01:08:34 AM
I didn't think Hasselhoff was that bad actually.... The rest of the movie was a fucking train wreck, but I though Michael Knight pulled off Fury pretty well.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 03, 2006, 11:53:24 AM
Quote
I'm so relieved that they didn't use the mofo sumbitch Cat Dude incarnation. That still pisses me off - like we don't have enough cat people in comics.
Ew, I forgot about that!  Ew!  Mental image!

Quote
Finishing the thought after a convoluted phone call - no insult to Halle or Rebecca fans, but I found it a pretty libido-free movie because I don't care for any of the women.
They don't do anything for me either.  =\

Quote
I wish Iman could have been Storm.
Hell yeah!  That would've been sweet!

Quote
I am kinda disapointed overall with how Cyclops has been portrayed in the movies.
Same here, and I never even really liked Cyclops.  I just think he deserved better.

The whole Wolverine/Jean thing really puts me off.  I like that pairing better when it's something neither one can actually bring themselves to act upon.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: tomduo on Jun 03, 2006, 12:56:49 PM
Well the thing I didn't like about movie three was... Jean rejected him in movie 2! He just jumped on her like a fag, right after she 'dumped' Cyc. Cold move... doesn't he know bros before hos?
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Extra Zero on Jun 03, 2006, 01:10:01 PM
He's Canadian.  There's no such thing as "bros before hos" in Canada! Ask aDam...
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on Jun 03, 2006, 01:28:46 PM
I'll drink to that.  Tapping ass takes priority over pretty much everything... even breathing depending on what I'm doing.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Max Con on Jun 03, 2006, 01:49:38 PM
Bros before hoes has always been a stupid saying.


Besides, Wolverine's never cared much for Cyc.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Lynch on Jun 03, 2006, 03:01:00 PM
Watched X3 last night after I finished downloading it.

Color me unimpressed.  

There was a lot of potential here, the actors were great, the sets were great, the CG was good but the story was simply blah, the direction was half assed at best, what happened to most of the characters fell flat and unlike when you finished watching the last two movies I did not feel the need to ever bother see X3 again.  Too much of the movie was pointless overall.

Oh and the BO for the movie fell 78% from last week so seems most had their fill of the movie as well.   Blame the poor word of mouth of the film on that.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on Jun 03, 2006, 03:03:32 PM
I've always thought it was a retarded expression. I mean it's not like I'm saying "fuck you guys I'm not friends with you anymore 'cause my girl doesn't like you" but when I have the chocie of spending time with her or hanging out with my friends, I'll spend time with her.  How can you be prepared to spend your life with someone and then tell them that going out boozing or to the strippers is more important than her?
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 03, 2006, 05:42:48 PM
ha ha, I was like "body odor fell 78%"?
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie AKA on Jun 07, 2006, 11:30:12 AM
Quote
Cold move... doesn't he know bros before hos?

According to most fanfic sites, it's "slash before gash".  :P
 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 08, 2006, 01:06:54 AM
Gash? :x
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Faye Valentine on Jun 08, 2006, 09:14:22 AM
slash??


I don't get it :o  
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Bernie on Jun 08, 2006, 09:45:58 AM
slash - (n) slang: Word used in fanfiction to denote homosexual pairings. Usually male/male, sometimes female/female AKA femmeslash. Often used interchangeably with yaoi or yuri.

gash - (n) slang:  A word used to describe female genitalia.

Bros before hos/slash before gash....

*hands Faye a bloody mary with extra Tabasco*

Chase this with an espresso and it will all make sense.  :)


 
 
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: tomduo on Jun 08, 2006, 10:01:03 AM
Never heard that term for Gayeity.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 10, 2006, 05:28:10 PM
"Slash" I knew, but "gash".... I was like "jeez, don't tell me we're making holes now!".....
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Dagurasu on Jun 12, 2006, 01:18:55 PM
It's called guro.

All holes are good, even the ones you make yourself.

4chan scarred my innocence. x.x
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 14, 2006, 09:45:45 PM
All holes are not good.  FACT.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on Jun 14, 2006, 10:00:32 PM
I've yet to penetrate one I didn't enjoy...
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 14, 2006, 10:18:18 PM
What about the hole's feelings, damn you.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Lynch on Jun 15, 2006, 12:26:30 AM
Yeah but this way at least Faye stays quiet with her mouth full.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: Chopper Face 69 on Jun 15, 2006, 12:41:01 AM
Quote
What about the hole's feelings, damn you.
Always a positive reaction.
Title: X-Men 3 review - Spoilers
Post by: B E C K on Jun 17, 2006, 05:42:20 PM
Through a knife wound in someone's leg?  A strained nostril?  I don't think so!